How to Keep Moving Forward
March 7th, 2012
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This article, originally written in September 2005, is republished with minor editing.
“If I had known grandchildren were so great, I would have had them first,” goes the bumper sticker. Grandparents think their grandchildren are grand and grandchildren think their grandparents are grand. At least, that’s the way it should be.
But how would you like for your grandchildren to think a little less of you? Only because of two words you omitted? Would you want some of your grandchildren to end up with more of your assets after your death than the others? There could be reasons you would want that; but assuming that’s not the case, how could a careless error cause this?
I recently helped a grandmother who was vulnerable to this happening. Her primary beneficiaries were her children. On her insurance contract, if one of her children had died before her, when she died, the surviving children would receive the deceased child’s portion in equal shares. If, for example, a common accident had resulted in this situation, two of her grandchildren (the children of her predeceased child) would have received none of the insurance proceeds. All would have gone to her other children.
This is not what she wanted. The insurance company default was “per capita” instead of “per stirpes”. Her Last Will and Testament would have had no power over it. Insurance contracts, 401(k)s, and IRAs typically transfer directly to designated beneficiaries—not through probate.
The Latin phrase “per stirpes”, meaning “by branch” were the instructions the insurance company needed to correct the problem. Have you checked your will or trust lately? Have you checked your primary and contingent beneficiaries on your retirement plans and insurance policies? Don’t tarnish a good legacy with confusion and disappointment. Leave a legacy of thoughtfulness regarding the distribution of your assets to your heirs.
This article, originally written in September 2005, is republished with minor editing.
The last time I remember seeing someone wearing a leisure suit was at the Wagon Wheel restaurant in Dahlonega, oh, probably ten years ago. It caught my attention because nobody else wore leisure suits at that time. They had been out of style for at least a decade. But this fellow didn’t care. He seemed to be perfectly happy.
In my business, I see some portfolios with out-of-style investments. People sport them around, just as happy as they can be.
For example, investors can get emotionally attached to an individual stock. They’re not holding it because of performance. Nor does it meet an objective investment criterion such as earnings growth, dividends, price momentum, or valuations—no, they keep holding it because it is already there.
Back to my analogy…They just keep wearing it because it’s in the closet and can’t stand the thought of dumping it. They keep sporting around this hideous, double knit, polyester, whatever…hoping that maybe, some day, it will become fashionable again.
In the mean time, growth opportunities are passing them by while the countdown to retirement marches on.
The fear of change paralyzes some investors in a time warp. Becoming comfortable with the status quo is often an investor’s worst enemy.
So, here are some tips on investment fashion.
Does your portfolio need a makeover? Don’t you think it’s time to dump the leisure suit and slide into an Armani? You’ll feel much better about yourself.
This article, originally written in July 2005, is republished with minor editing.
I do not like to use the words “poverty” and “retirement” in the same sentence. My business is about helping people enjoy a nice lifestyle in retirement without worrying about being short on money. But the new rules of retirement force us to confront this issue.
Government statistics reveal that 63% of people age 65 and older have annual incomes under $25,000.1
Government and employers guaranteeing retirees income and health benefits throughout their retirement is the way it was. More and more, as people are living longer, both the government and employers are decreasing retiree benefits and shifting more of the financial burden on us.
The challenges are real. Longevity, reduced benefits, inflation, market risk, and rising health care costs are converging to create what some have called “the perfect storm” for retirees.
These four steps can help you steer clear of the storm.
Prepare for the unexpected. You cannot prepare for every disaster that could strike, but you can have a cash fund for emergency expenses. Having the right insurance for liability, sickness, death, disability, and/or long term care also makes good sense for many people.
Save as much as you can. A vital part of good financial planning is having cash flow margin to invest for future needs. If we spend it all now, there is no money for future needs. Predictably, a large majority of retirees polled regret not having saved more for retirement. Don’t just be a money conduit. Let some of it stick to you on the way through.
Don’t settle for pitiful returns. People often play it too safe and sacrifice eating well later for sleeping well now. Inflation over time can ravage your retirement assets. At least give yourself the chance of getting the returns you need for a better retirement.
Don’t take too much risk. Chasing returns, buying overvalued stocks, and not being properly diversified, to name a few, are risky mistakes that can leave you sweeping up after everyone else has left the party. And sadly, too many of those burned over the last few years have too little time to make up the losses.
To do your best financially, planning is crucial. Good planning puts real numbers to your goals. Early planning makes the goals easier to achieve. It is no surprise that those most satisfied in retirement are those who planned early.
1 Source: Social Security Administration, The Office of Policy, Income of the Population 55 or older; February 2002
This article was originally written in May 2005.
How should we view money? God has made it clear we should not love it (1Tim 6:10), trust in it (1Tim 6:17), nor hoard it (Luke 12:18).
The reason is this: We can only serve one master. Jesus said, “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”
So does that mean we should be unconcerned about our finances? Not at all. Jesus Christ said, “If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?” (Luke 16:11). Notice how powerful this verse is. How we manage material things, “unrighteous mammon”, is so important, it affects our spiritual blessings, “the true riches”.
We are stewards of the money that God has entrusted to us. He calls us to faithfully manage it.
Instead of loving money and trying to “use” God, as many do, we should love God and use money—and use it wisely.
This article, originally written in May 2005, is republished with minor editions.
One of the greatest financial planning tools our benevolent representatives in Washington have ever granted us is the Roth IRA. (Half sarcasm, half sincerity)
The Roth IRA allows after-tax money to grow tax free. (Remember an IRA does not refer to the investment—it refers to the tax treatment. You can have all kinds of savings and investments inside your IRAs. Also remember, IRS eligibility requirements apply. You also must have earned income to contribute and higher income levels can limit your contributions.)
With a Roth, there are no Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) at age 70.5 as with traditional IRAs.
Also, consider the tremendous tax-free wealth building potential for your heirs by “stretching” the Roth.
Having a bucket of tax free money in retirement can also give you some control over your taxable income when you are drawing from your assets in retirement. This could make a significant difference in the amount you are taxed on social security income.
Why wait until April of next year to make this year’s contribution? Invest early in January and get a 15.5 month tax-free advantage. If you do this every year, the compound growth on the tax savings can be significant.
This article, originally written in April 2005, is republished with minor editing.
Two brothers inherited $100,000 each. Larry put his money in an account that earned an average of 4% per year. When he retired 25 years later, he had $266,584. Unfortunately inflation had reduced his purchasing power such that he was not much further ahead 25 years later.
His brother, John, put his money in an account that earned an average of 7% per year, with some fluctuation from year to year. When John retired 25 years later, he had $542,743.
John had earned $276,159 more than his brother simply by earning 7% per year versus 4%.
This hypothetical story shows what a difference there is between 4% and 7% compounded annually over time. Taxes were not considered.
With people living longer, retiring earlier, and fewer employer pension plans, growth on savings has become even more important than in the past.
In order to avoid the risk of losing any money, many people put their savings into bank accounts that pay very little interest, with no potential of earning more. Thus their money grows at a very slow rate. This is one of the biggest mistakes retirees make: under-estimating inflation risk.
The bottom line is, most people cannot save enough to have a comfortable retirement, without a good rate of return on their savings. They need growth. They need growth that will outpace inflation to ensure their purchasing power is not eroded over time.
What a difference a few extra percentage points of return can make. Larry was so concerned about losing a portion of his $100,000, he lost $276,159 over time by playing it too safe. In so doing, he was the real loser.
This article was originally written in April 2005.
God does address this subject in scripture. “But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.” (1Timothy 6:9)
Notice, it is not necessarily wrong to be rich. It’s wrong to “will” (desire) to be rich.
So what is the proper attitude toward being rich?
We shouldn’t desire to be rich. If we are rich, we should not be “high-minded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy.” (1Timothy 6:17)
Why then should we seek to get a good return on our money? Here’s why.
Regardless of how much we’ve been given, God expects us to manage it well. (Read Matthew 25:14-30; Luke 16:11).
The proverb below conveys the right attitude. …Give me neither poverty nor riches…Lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, Who is the LORD? or lest I be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain. (Proverbs 30:8,9)